Ryanair investors revolt on £129 million O’Leary deal
Budget airline Ryanair has seen more than a third of shareholders vote against pay plans for boss Michael O’Leary that could net him £129 million.
The Dublin-based carrier revealed nearly 40 per cent of investors at its annual general meeting rejected the plan.
However, the deal looks set to go ahead after receiving a majority of votes in favour.
Ryanair says it will “consult with shareholders to understand the reasons behind the result.”
Ryanair announced earlier this year that it had agreed a new contract under which Mr O’Leary will be given an option to buy ten million shares at £23.13 each if profits exceed £3.4 billion, or if its share price goes above £37.
The group said the option would be subject to Mr O’Leary staying with the group until April 2032, as well as “very ambitious” performance targets.
Mr O’Leary has been chief executive since 1994 and has been on the group’s board since 1988.
The mammoth pay deal comes as Ryanair faces soaring cost pressures, in line with many rivals in the sector.
It said in July that quarterly profits slumped by more than a third to £462 million for the three months to the end of June.
Earnings were hit by surging jet fuel prices, as well as a six per cent drop in average fares.
This offset six per cent growth in passenger numbers to 61.3 million and a one per cent rise in overall revenues to £3.72 billion.
Want your business, product or service to be seen regionally and nationally? Bdaily helps you get your story in front of the right audience, every day. Find out how Bdaily can help →
Join more than 55,000 subscribers by signing up to our daily bulletin each morning here.
Taking advantage of the opportunities ahead
Accountability isn’t the enemy of empathy
Act now to avoid a last-minute tax scramble
How inner-city living can transform a city by the sea
Artificial intelligence's value is the time it gives back
Why we must break the magnetic pull of London
AI scepticism is healthy - inaction isn't
What does NPPF mean for planning gain and pricing?
What new NPPF rules mean for landowners
The hidden cost squeezing Britain's economy
Teesside deserves more than cashback devolution
Construction must be built on commercial discipline