Partner Article
Optimistic CEOs are paid less
For the first time, a study that measures CEO optimism through stock option exercise decisions and earnings forecasts shows that the more optimistic a CEO, the less they’ll get paid.
The research from HEC Paris business school finds that executives with a positive outlook receive smaller stock option grants, fewer bonus payments, and lower total compensation than their more realistic peers because they overestimate the value of compensation components that depend on successful outcomes.
This means that they are often happy to accept smaller pay packages based on the assumption that stock options, in particular, will be worth more in the future than could reasonably be expected.
As a result, optimistic CEOs will wait to exercise their options, even if they’re ‘in the money’.
This is the first study to empirically examine how CEO beliefs are reflected in pay schemes. Looking at a sample of over 2,500 CEOs at 1,889 firms, Professor Clemens Otto studied the relation between CEO pay packages and the CEOs’ decisions on when to exercise stock options, combined with the difference between earnings per share (EPS) forecasts and actual earnings during the CEOs’ tenure.
Professor Otto says: “The findings show that companies could take advantage of overly optimistic CEOs and pay them less than they otherwise would.” – An interesting subversion of the theory that ‘fat-cat’ CEOs hold their firms to ransom on pay.
This was posted in Bdaily's Members' News section by HEC Paris .
Construction must be built on commercial discipline
Devolution needs financial firepower to drive growth
The value of creating a stronger careers route
Apprenticeships: Invest in talent or keep chasing it
Are you ready for salary transparency?
Confidence the key to our artificial intelligence future
The missing piece of the puzzle in the NEET crisis
The North East investment story needs two engines
We must forge change to close the skills gap
Creating the conditions for North East talent to thrive
Time to end London monopoly on arts talent
Why local government is key to devolution success